Розмір шрифта:
THE ETHICAL DIMENSION OF TRUST IN TECHNOLOGY: LINGUISTIC MARKERS OF AUTHORITATIVENESS IN AI-GENERATED TEXT
Остання редакція: 2026-10-03
Анотація
This study investigates the ethical dimensions of epistemic trust in AI-generated texts. It analyses the linguistic markers, such as the absence of epistemic hedging and hyper-normative lexical smoothness, through which large language models construct an illusion of expertise and trigger automation bias. Special attention is given to the ethical paradox of hallucinated academic apparatuses, particularly fictitious DOIs. The need for integrating digital linguistic hygiene into education is substantiated.
Ключові слова
artificial intelligence; trust; linguistic markers; hallucinations; digital hygiene
Посилання
1. Balázs, L. (2026). Epistemic Trust in Generative AI as an Information Source: Development and Validation of the Trust in AI-Epistemic Scale (TAI-E). Social Sciences, 15(7), 433. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci15070433.
2. Nykyporets, S., & Boiko, Y. (2026). Anthropomorphic metaphors in contemporary technical discourse: a cognitive-linguistic analysis of the IT terminological system. In Science and education in the third millennium: information technology, education, law, psychology, social security and work, management (1st ed., p. 762). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20810460.
3. Woodruff, E., & Hewitt, J. (2026). Epistemic Agency in the Age of Large Language Models: Design Principles for Knowledge-Building AI. AI, 7(3), 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai7030099.
4. Rodman A, Zwaan L. We need a new paradigm to think about generative AI. (2025). BMJ Quality & Safety. 35, 440-442. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2025-019828.
5. Nykyporets, S. S., & Hadaichuk, N. M. (2025). Foreign language media literacy as a protective factor against AI-generated disinformation and psychological stress in technical higher education in Ukraine. In Transformational vectors of public administration, law, and humanities in the development of the modern educational system: Scientific monograph (pp. 305-330). Baltija Publishing. https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-647-8-14.
6. Nguyen T. (2024). ChatGPT in Medical Education: A Precursor for Automation Bias?. JMIR medical education, 10, e50174. https://doi.org/10.2196/50174.
7. Kot, S. O., & Nykyporets, S. S. (2025). Activating students’ cognitive engagement in technical English learning with AI tools. In Science and education in the third millennium: Information technology, education, law, psychology, social security and work, management. International collective monograph (Vol. I, pp. 295-332). Lublin, Polska: Institute of Public Administration Affairs. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16942267.
8. Ibrahimova, L. V., & Nykyporets, S. S. (2025). Information security in the global context: Linguistic perspectives and the role of English. In International security studies: Managerial, technical, legal, environmental, informative and psychological aspects (Vol. II, pp. 321-345). ISAP, Research and Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15356365.
9. Stepanova, I. S., & Nykyporets, S. S. (2026). Foreign language instruction as a means of developing students’ academic presentation competence. Society and national interests. Series "Education/Pedagogy", 1(21), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.52058/3041-1572-2026-1(21)-16-29.
2. Nykyporets, S., & Boiko, Y. (2026). Anthropomorphic metaphors in contemporary technical discourse: a cognitive-linguistic analysis of the IT terminological system. In Science and education in the third millennium: information technology, education, law, psychology, social security and work, management (1st ed., p. 762). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.20810460.
3. Woodruff, E., & Hewitt, J. (2026). Epistemic Agency in the Age of Large Language Models: Design Principles for Knowledge-Building AI. AI, 7(3), 99. https://doi.org/10.3390/ai7030099.
4. Rodman A, Zwaan L. We need a new paradigm to think about generative AI. (2025). BMJ Quality & Safety. 35, 440-442. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2025-019828.
5. Nykyporets, S. S., & Hadaichuk, N. M. (2025). Foreign language media literacy as a protective factor against AI-generated disinformation and psychological stress in technical higher education in Ukraine. In Transformational vectors of public administration, law, and humanities in the development of the modern educational system: Scientific monograph (pp. 305-330). Baltija Publishing. https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-26-647-8-14.
6. Nguyen T. (2024). ChatGPT in Medical Education: A Precursor for Automation Bias?. JMIR medical education, 10, e50174. https://doi.org/10.2196/50174.
7. Kot, S. O., & Nykyporets, S. S. (2025). Activating students’ cognitive engagement in technical English learning with AI tools. In Science and education in the third millennium: Information technology, education, law, psychology, social security and work, management. International collective monograph (Vol. I, pp. 295-332). Lublin, Polska: Institute of Public Administration Affairs. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16942267.
8. Ibrahimova, L. V., & Nykyporets, S. S. (2025). Information security in the global context: Linguistic perspectives and the role of English. In International security studies: Managerial, technical, legal, environmental, informative and psychological aspects (Vol. II, pp. 321-345). ISAP, Research and Education. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15356365.
9. Stepanova, I. S., & Nykyporets, S. S. (2026). Foreign language instruction as a means of developing students’ academic presentation competence. Society and national interests. Series "Education/Pedagogy", 1(21), 16-29. https://doi.org/10.52058/3041-1572-2026-1(21)-16-29.
Повний текст:
PDF