Розмір шрифта:
THE SUSTAINABILITY OF THE BEST ALTERNATIVE WHEN CHANGING THE CRITERIA WEIGHTS IN MCDA ASSESSMENT OF ENVELOPES ENERGY EFFICIENCY POTENTIAL
Остання редакція: 2020-11-09
Анотація
The assessment of energy efficient potential of multilayered envelopes was performed by Multi Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) techniques. There were compared eight types of wall assemblies from natural materials: hempcrete, adobe, strawbale panel, earthbag, cordwood, SIP (plywood+ecofiber), hempcrete+straw and energy efficient block. Validation of the best alternative sustainability was calculated by DECERNS MCDA software. Conducted research revealed that the most sensible criteria in weight range of [0.1-0.3] are «cost», «mass» and «u-value». Further analysis of the increasing/decreasing trends in wall assemblies should be conducted to discover the key role of specific criteria weight changing on the priority arrangement of the best wall alternative.
Ключові слова
TOPSIS; MCDA methods; weighting method; wall assemblies
Повний текст:
PDF